FAQs

PFAS Policy

According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), PFAS are a large group of manufactured chemicals that have been used in industry and consumer products since the 1940s because of their useful properties. There are thousands of different PFAS, including perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (“PFOS”), two of the most widely used and studied PFAS.

Additional information about PFAS can be found on the EPA’s PFAS website.

Learn More →

PFAS are a large group of chemicals that have been widely used because of properties such as resistance to water, oil, heat, and certain chemicals. Their durability and ability to provide water- and stain-repellent properties have led to their use in a wide variety of consumer, commercial, and industrial applications.

PFAS have historically been used in products such as stain-resistant textiles, non-stick cookware, rainwear and other outdoor clothing, as well as certain personal care and cosmetic products.

Learn More →

PFAS-based finishes have historically been used on outer shell materials in firefighter and other first responder PPE to provide water- and stain-repellent properties. These durable water repellent (DWR) finishes help reduce the absorption of liquids and contaminants that may come into contact with the garment.

Fluorinated technologies have also historically been used in underlying protective layers, including certain moisture barriers, to help prevent liquids from penetrating through the protective clothing.

Learn more about how turnout gear materials and technologies are evolving →

PFAS chemistries have historically been used in first responder PPE for two principal purposes:

  1. Water- and stain-repellent finishes: Certain PFAS chemistries have been used in durable water repellent (DWR) finishes applied to fabrics. These finishes help reduce water absorption and staining, which can help gear remain lighter when exposed to moisture and support material performance and durability.
  2. Moisture barrier technologies: Fluorinated technologies have also historically been used in some moisture barriers to help prevent liquids, including potentially hazardous fluids and chemicals, from penetrating through the protective clothing while allowing moisture vapor to escape.

Materials and technologies continue to evolve, including the introduction of non-PFAS options for structural turnout gear.

Explore Ricochet's non-PFAS turnout gear resources →

No. Ricochet does not manufacture PFAS chemicals or directly apply PFAS-based finishes to its products.

Ricochet purchases materials and components from suppliers. Some of these materials may have PFAS-based finishes applied, contain a fluorinated barrier technology, or both. The chemical manufacturing and application of these technologies occur upstream in the supply chain before the materials or components are supplied to Ricochet.

Ricochet also offers non-PFAS turnout gear options using qualifying materials and components that meet the applicable ≤100 ppm total fluorine threshold.

Explore Ricochet's non-PFAS options →

Yes, some Ricochet products and material configurations may contain PFAS. However, non-PFAS options are now available for structural turnout gear.

Ricochet offers non-PFAS configurations across its Maverick™, Prime™, and Response™ structural turnout gear packages using qualifying materials and components that meet the applicable ≤100 ppm total fluorine threshold.

NFPA 1970 does not require turnout gear to be non-PFAS. Rather, manufacturers can offer certified material systems using either fluorinated or qualifying non-PFAS technologies, depending on the materials and configuration selected.

Because material options and technologies continue to evolve, customers and dealers should refer to Ricochet’s current resources for the latest available non-PFAS options and supporting information.

View Current Non-PFAS Turnout Gear Options →

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), scientific research suggests that exposure to certain PFAS may be associated with adverse health outcomes. Studies have identified potential effects including reproductive and developmental effects, increased risk of certain cancers, reduced immune response, interference with the body’s natural hormones, and increased cholesterol levels and/or risk of obesity.

Research is ongoing, and the potential health effects can vary depending on the specific PFAS, level and duration of exposure, and other factors. People may be exposed to PFAS through a variety of pathways, including contaminated drinking water and food, certain consumer products, occupational environments, and PFAS-containing firefighting foams.

Researchers continue to study PFAS exposure among firefighters and the potential contribution of different occupational exposure sources, including protective equipment, firefighting foams, combustion environments, and other materials encountered during emergency response.

Additional information about current PFAS health research is available on the EPA’s PFAS website.

Learn More

Yes. Ricochet offers certified non-PFAS structural firefighting gear options and continues to work with material suppliers to expand the number of non-PFAS composite configurations available to departments.

Under NFPA 1970, qualifying protective elements can be identified as having a PFAS (total fluorine) concentration of no more than 100 ppm (≤100 ppm) upon certification. Total fluorine is used as a proxy for evaluating PFAS because there is not currently a standardized method for directly measuring every PFAS chemical that may be present in a material or component.

Explore our available non-PFAS turnout gear solutions to compare certified composites, materials, and package options.

Explore Non-PFAS Turnout Gear & Resources

As with all new products, there can be tradeoffs when new material technologies are introduced. Our foremost concern is to ensure that any product introduced by Ricochet complies with all minimum requirements of the r NFPA and protects first responders from the hazardous conditions they encounter on the job. For those materials or components that are made without PFAS, we believe there will be pros and cons to the new material or component. The transition to PFAS-free outer shells may mean that clothing exteriors are more likely to pick up water weight, stain more easily, and absorb increased amounts of contaminant. However, we do not know how these new finishes will affect overall outer shell durability or ease of cleaning, which could be better or worse than outer shells that use PFAS-based finishes. Where barrier materials no longer use PFAS, there could be similar decreases in performance particularly as related to breathability and durability, though there is no current information to evaluate these potential impacts since new moisture barriers are not available in certified gear. If breathability is lowered, it is possible that the choices of composites involving selection of outer shell and thermal barriers could further be affected. It is also possible that other shortcomings or advantages will be discovered once the new PFAS-free technology has been used in the field for a few years. Ricochet will inform its customers about any tradeoffs as additional information and field data become available. 

For more information, feel free to visit our website or talk to your Ricochet sales representative. We will do our best to keep you as informed as we are!